Finding needles in a haystack
I recently did a interview on the Reimagining Cyber Podcast about advancements in the software security industry. I then took some time to think about the Fortify product that I have worked with for so many years. The pro and the con, what are your thoughts?
OpenText - Fortify
Pros of using source code tools like Fortify for software code quality:
Got Unified security yet?
Physical and logical security convergence refers to the integration of traditional physical security measures (such as cameras, locks, and alarms) with computer-based security systems (such as network security, access control, and surveillance). This convergence allows for a more comprehensive and holistic approach to security, as it allows organizations to better protect their assets and personnel by considering both the physical and digital realms.
One of the main benefits of physical and logical security convergence is that it allows for better information sharing between different security systems. For example, an access control system can be integrated with a video surveillance system, so that if a door is opened without proper authorization, a video of the event can be automatically recorded. This can help organizations quickly identify and respond to security breaches.
Another benefit of physical and logical security convergence is that it allows for more efficient use of resources. By integrating different security systems, organizations can reduce the number of separate devices and systems that need to be managed and maintained. This can help lower costs and reduce the risk of system failures.
One of the main challenges of physical and logical security convergence is that it can be difficult to achieve. This is because different security systems are often developed by different vendors and use different protocols and standards. This can make it difficult to integrate different systems together, and can lead to compatibility issues.
Another challenge of physical and logical security convergence is that it can be difficult to manage. This is because as more systems are integrated, the number of variables that need to be considered can increase, making it more difficult to identify and respond to security breaches.
Overall, physical and logical security convergence can provide a more comprehensive and holistic approach to security, allowing organizations to better protect their assets and personnel. However, it can be difficult to achieve and manage, and requires careful planning and execution to be successful.
Going Virtual with VMWARE, TIPS
VMWare ESXi is a popular virtualization platform for running multiple Windows servers, including Active Directory, file, and print services. Here are some best practices for setting up a VMWare ESXi system for this purpose:
Trust your providers
When it comes to security, it's important for businesses to trust their service providers. Accreditation is a way for businesses to ensure that their service providers are meeting industry standards and that they are providing high-quality services.
One of the main reasons why businesses should buy security services from accredited service providers is that these providers have been independently vetted by a third party. This means that they have been assessed against a set of standards and have been found to meet or exceed those standards. This provides businesses with a level of assurance that they are working with a reputable and trustworthy provider.
Another reason why businesses should buy security services from accredited service providers is that these providers have a proven track record of success. Accreditation is not a one-time event; it must be renewed on a regular basis, meaning that providers must continuously meet the standards in order to maintain their accreditation. This means that businesses can trust that their providers have the necessary experience and expertise to provide high-quality security services.
Accreditation can also help businesses ensure that their service providers are keeping up with the latest technology and industry developments. Accreditation bodies often require providers to demonstrate that they are using the latest technology and that they are staying up-to-date with industry trends. This helps businesses ensure that their service providers are providing the most current and effective security solutions.
Moreover, Accreditation also ensures that the service providers are adhering to the regulations, laws and compliance requirement that are specific to the industry or sector they are operating in. This is especially important for businesses that operate in regulated industries, such as financial services or healthcare, where compliance with regulations is critical to maintaining the trust of customers and stakeholders.
Additionally, Accreditation also helps in building trust with the customers and partners. When a business is working with an accredited security service provider, it sends a message to its customers and partners that the business takes security seriously and that it is committed to protecting its own and its customers' assets and sensitive information.
In summary, businesses should buy security services from accredited service providers because these providers have been independently vetted, have a proven track record of success, are keeping up with the latest technology and industry developments, adhering to the regulations, laws and compliance requirements and also helps in building trust with the customers and partners. Accreditation is an important way for businesses to ensure that they are working with reputable and trustworthy providers and that they are getting the high-quality security services they need to protect their assets and personnel.
If your organization runs an OWA server exposed to the internet, assume compromise between 02/26-03/03. Check for 8 character aspx files in C:\\inetpub\wwwroot\aspnet_client\system_web\. If you get a hit on that search, you’re now in incident response mode.
Microsoft has detected multiple 0-day exploits being used to attack on-premises versions of Microsoft Exchange Server in limited and targeted attacks. In the attacks observed, the threat actor used these vulnerabilities to access on-premises Exchange servers which enabled access to email accounts, and allowed installation of additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) attributes this campaign with high confidence to HAFNIUM, a group assessed to be state-sponsored and operating out of China, based on observed victimology, tactics and procedures.
The vulnerabilities recently being exploited were CVE-2021-26855, CVE-2021-26857, CVE-2021-26858, and CVE-2021-27065, all of which were addressed in today’s Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) release – Multiple Security Updates Released for Exchange Server. We strongly urge customers to update on-premises systems immediately. Exchange Online is not affected.
Update [03/04/2020]: The Exchange Server team released a script for checking HAFNIUM indicators of compromise (IOCs). See Scan Exchange log files for indicators of compromise.
We are sharing this information with our customers and the security community to emphasize the critical nature of these vulnerabilities and the importance of patching all affected systems immediately to protect against these exploits and prevent future abuse across the ecosystem. This blog also continues our mission to shine a light on malicious actors and elevate awareness of the sophisticated tactics and techniques used to target our customers. The related IOCs, Azure Sentinel advanced hunting queries, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint product detections and queries shared in this blog will help SOCs proactively hunt for related activity in their environments and elevate any alerts for remediation.
Microsoft would like to thank our industry colleagues at Volexity and Dubex for reporting different parts of the attack chain and their collaboration in the investigation. Volexity has also published a blog post with their analysis. It is this level of proactive communication and intelligence sharing that allows the community to come together to get ahead of attacks before they spread and improve security for all.
Who is HAFNIUM?HAFNIUM primarily targets entities in the United States across a number of industry sectors, including infectious disease researchers, law firms, higher education institutions, defense contractors, policy think tanks, and NGOs.
HAFNIUM has previously compromised victims by exploiting vulnerabilities in internet-facing servers, and has used legitimate open-source frameworks, like Covenant, for command and control. Once they’ve gained access to a victim network, HAFNIUM typically exfiltrates data to file sharing sites like MEGA.
In campaigns unrelated to these vulnerabilities, Microsoft has observed HAFNIUM interacting with victim Office 365 tenants. While they are often unsuccessful in compromising customer accounts, this reconnaissance activity helps the adversary identify more details about their targets’ environments.
HAFNIUM operates primarily from leased virtual private servers (VPS) in the United States.
Technical detailsMicrosoft is providing the following details to help our customers understand the techniques used by HAFNIUM to exploit these vulnerabilities and enable more effective defense against any future attacks against unpatched systems.
CVE-2021-26855 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Exchange which allowed the attacker to send arbitrary HTTP requests and authenticate as the Exchange server.
CVE-2021-26857 is an insecure deserialization vulnerability in the Unified Messaging service. Insecure deserialization is where untrusted user-controllable data is deserialized by a program. Exploiting this vulnerability gave HAFNIUM the ability to run code as SYSTEM on the Exchange server. This requires administrator permission or another vulnerability to exploit.
CVE-2021-26858 is a post-authentication arbitrary file write vulnerability in Exchange. If HAFNIUM could authenticate with the Exchange server then they could use this vulnerability to write a file to any path on the server. They could authenticate by exploiting the CVE-2021-26855 SSRF vulnerability or by compromising a legitimate admin’s credentials.
CVE-2021-27065 is a post-authentication arbitrary file write vulnerability in Exchange. If HAFNIUM could authenticate with the Exchange server then they could use this vulnerability to write a file to any path on the server. They could authenticate by exploiting the CVE-2021-26855 SSRF vulnerability or by compromising a legitimate admin’s credentials.
Attack detailsAfter exploiting these vulnerabilities to gain initial access, HAFNIUM operators deployed web shells on the compromised server. Web shells potentially allow attackers to steal data and perform additional malicious actions that lead to further compromise. One example of a web shell deployed by HAFNIUM, written in ASP, is below:
Following web shell deployment, HAFNIUM operators performed the following post-exploitation activity:
HAFNIUM operators were also able to download the Exchange offline address book from compromised systems, which contains information about an organization and its users.
Our blog, Defending Exchange servers under attack, offers advice for improving defenses against Exchange server compromise. Customers can also find additional guidance about web shell attacks in our blog Web shell attacks continue to rise.
Can I determine if I have been compromised by this activity?The below sections provide indicators of compromise (IOCs), detection guidance, and advanced hunting queries to help customers investigate this activity using Exchange server logs, Azure Sentinel, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Microsoft 365 Defender. We encourage our customers to conduct investigations and implement proactive detections to identify possible prior campaigns and prevent future campaigns that may target their systems.
Check patch levels of Exchange ServerThe Microsoft Exchange Server team has published a blog post on these new Security Updates providing a script to get a quick inventory of the patch-level status of on-premises Exchange servers and answer some basic questions around installation of these patches.
Scan Exchange log files for indicators of compromiseThe Exchange Server team has created a script to run a check for HAFNIUM IOCs to address performance and memory concerns. That script is available here: https://github.com/microsoft/CSS-Exchange/tree/main/Security.
Host IOCsHashesWeb shell hashes
Customers should monitor these paths for LSASS dumps:
Microsoft Defender Antivirus detectionsPlease note that some of these detections are generic detections and not unique to this campaign or these exploits.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint advanced hunting queriesMicrosoft 365 Defender customers can find related hunting queries below or at this GitHub location: https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-365-Defender-Hunting-Queries/
Additional queries and information are available via Threat Analytics portal for Microsoft Defender customers.
UMWorkerProcess.exe in Exchange creating abnormal content
Look for Microsoft Exchange Server’s Unified Messaging service creating non-standard content on disk, which could indicate web shells or other malicious content, suggesting exploitation of CVE-2021-26858 vulnerability:
DeviceFileEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName == "UMWorkerProcess.exe" | where FileName != "CacheCleanup.bin" | where FileName !endswith ".txt" | where FileName !endswith ".LOG" | where FileName !endswith ".cfg" | where FileName != "cleanup.bin"
Look for Microsoft Exchange Server’s Unified Messaging service spawning abnormal subprocesses, suggesting exploitation of CVE-2021-26857 vulnerability:
DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName == "UMWorkerProcess.exe" | where FileName != "wermgr.exe" | where FileName != "WerFault.exe"
Please note excessive spawning of wermgr.exe and WerFault.exe could be an indicator of compromise due to the service crashing during deserialization.
Azure Sentinel advanced hunting queriesAzure Sentinel customers can find a Sentinel query containing these indicators in the Azure Sentinel Portal or at this GitHub location: https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel/tree/master/Detections/MultipleDataSources/.
Look for Nishang Invoke-PowerShellTcpOneLine in Windows Event Logging:
SecurityEvent | where EventID == 4688 | where Process has_any ("powershell.exe", "PowerShell_ISE.exe") | where CommandLine has "$client = New-Object System.Net.Sockets.TCPClient"
Look for downloads of PowerCat in cmd and Powershell command line logging in Windows Event Logs:
SecurityEvent | where EventID == 4688 | where Process has_any ("cmd.exe", "powershell.exe", "PowerShell_ISE.exe") | where CommandLine has "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/besimorhino/powercat/master/powercat.ps1"
Look for Exchange PowerShell Snapin being loaded. This can be used to export mailbox data, subsequent command lines should be inspected to verify usage:
SecurityEvent | where EventID == 4688 | where Process has_any ("cmd.exe", "powershell.exe", "PowerShell_ISE.exe") | where isnotempty(CommandLine) | where CommandLine contains "Add-PSSnapin Microsoft.Exchange.Powershell.Snapin" | summarize FirstSeen = min(TimeGenerated), LastSeen = max(TimeGenerated) by Computer, Account, CommandLine
Its going to be a busy week...
This is my blog, there are many like it but this one is mine. Enjoy.